01
Organize each procurement
Keep projects, individual bids, CSI divisions, pretendents, criteria, and tender documents in a coherent structure.
Project and bid portfolio
PTA Studio
Procurement decision intelligence
Prime Tender Analytics
Tender decisions built to be explained.
Structure bid evaluations, combine objective data with decision-maker input, and produce a clear, reproducible recommendation from one controlled workspace.
Purpose-built for construction and technical procurement
A consistent evaluation record for every tender
Transparent weighting
Structured expert input
Reproducible ranking
English and Georgian
One evaluation workspace
Move from bid information to a defensible recommendation.
PTA keeps the commercial data, evaluation criteria, stakeholder judgments, calculations, and final evidence connected throughout the decision.
02
Collect decision-maker input
Invite the right reviewers, gather criterion importance through a focused survey, and monitor submission status.
Controlled stakeholder surveys
03
Calculate and compare
Combine objective variation, expert importance, and alternative performance through transparent MCDA methods.
CRITIC, RII and EDAS
04
Preserve the decision record
Generate a clear report and retain completed evaluations in history for review, governance, and future reference.
Reports and bid history
Methodology
A calculation trail, not a black box.
The platform separates objective evidence from expert judgment, then shows how both contribute to the final ranking.
Every result retains the inputs, criterion direction, weights, scores, and selected methodology used to produce it.
CRITIC
Objective evidence
CRITIC derives criterion weights from contrast intensity and inter-criterion correlation in the decision matrix.
RII
Expert judgment
RII summarizes the importance assigned by invited decision makers and keeps the response pattern visible.
EDAS
Final comparison
EDAS evaluates each eligible pretendent by its positive and negative distance from the average solution.
Decision governance
Built for scrutiny after the meeting ends.
Procurement decisions often need to be revisited months later. PTA keeps the context and the calculation together, so reviewers can understand what was decided and why.
Role-based decision-maker invitations
Visible response and completion status
Saved PDF evaluation reports
Project-level history across multiple bids
Bilingual interface for Georgian teams
Evaluation report
Municipal services / MEP
Complete record · 24 pages
01Tender context and criteria
02Weighting methodology
03Pretendent ranking
04Decision-maker patterns
Ready for review
Start with one real procurement
Make the next tender decision easier to defend.
Create an account, set up your organization, and begin your first evaluation inside the secure workspace.